a DoE Energy Frontier Research Center

Who We Are

The Center for Gas Separations (CGS) is one of 42 Energy Frontier Research Centers funded by the Department of Energy to conduct fundamental research that addresses the five Basic Energy Sciences Grand Challenges:

  1. How do we control material processes at the level of electrons?
  2. How do we design and perfect atom- and energy-efficient synthesis of revolutionary new forms of matter with tailored properties?
  3. How do remarkable properties of matter emerge from complex correlations of the atomic or electronic constituents and how can we control these properties?
  4. How can we master energy and information on the nanoscale to create new technologies with capabilities rivaling those of living things?
  5. How do we characterize and control matter away -especially very far away- from equilibrium?

The Center is made up of researchers across the US, at the University of California, Berkeley (lead institution), Lawrence Berkeley National Lab, Texas A&M University, Johns Hopkins University, University of Minnesota, the National Energy Technology Laboratory, and the National Institute of Standards and Technology.

What We Do

Although it is challenging to calculate the energy used by all chemical separation processes, the best estimates indicate that they account for 10-15% of the energy consumed globally. Some of the largest offenders are the purification of oxygen (O2, 91% of energy input is for separating N2), petroleum refining (>50% energy expended is for separations), and the separation of carbon dioxide (CO2) from H2 necessary for ammonia production (25% of energy consumed). In the US alone, separations account for an even greater ~22% of the total national energy input. Furthermore, when faced with climate change resulting from continually-increasing anthropogenic CO2 emissions and the corresponding necessity of large-scale carbon capture and storage, the cost of separations is expected to increase significantly. Reducing the total energy costs of separations would therefore contribute substantially to minimizing wasteful energy consumption globally.

To address this need, the primary goal within the Center for Gas Separations (CGS) is to tailor-make novel materials for highly efficient gas separations, with an emphasis on adsorbents that are highly selective for CO2 capture. This strategy addresses the 2nd Grand Challenge and requires a fundamental understanding of materials properties, molecular interactions, and the design of adsorbents tuned precisely for interactions with specific gases.

Novel Adsorbent Synthesis

A major thrust within the CGS is to design new adsorbents tuned to efficiently carry out a given gas separation. Research in the Center focuses heavily on metal-organic framework (MOF) adsorbents, which are a relatively new class of porous materials composed of metal ions connected by organic linkers in three dimensions. An essentially infinite library of possible metal and ligand combinations and their porous nature has rendered MOFs promising for specifically tailored gas storage and separation applications, as these materials can be designed with widely varying pore shapes, sizes, and internal surfaces. The CGS is focusing on the design of MOFs with open metal cations for separation of N2 from O2 and CH4, pore shapes that are selective for various hydrocarbons, and appended amines for selective adsorption of CO2. Some of the materials being investigated include a particularly promising family of frameworks exhibiting open metal sites, namely M2(dobdc) (dobdc4− = 2,5-dioxido-1,4-benzenedicarboxylate, M = Zn,[1] Mg[2]) and its more recently discovered expanded pore analogue, M2(dobpdc) (dobpdc4− = 4,4′-dioxido-3,3′-biphenyldicarboxylate, M = Mg, Zn).[3] The bare M2(dobdc) exhibits efficient separation of various gases,[4] while rapid synthesis of M2(dobdc) nanocrystals as recently demonstrated by researchers within the CGS[5] potentially opens new applications for this material. Most notably, appending N,N’-dimethylenediamine to the open metal sites in the expanded Mg2(dobpdc) results in a material with remarkably high selectivity and capacity for CO2 over N2, even in the presence of water. Importantly, this framework exhibits a sharp step in its CO2 adsorption isotherm that shifts dramatically to higher pressures with increasing temperature (Figure 1, top left). This step arises from an unprecedented cooperative CO2 adsorption mechanism (top right and bottom) that was recently elucidated through the collaborative effort of several groups within the CGS.[6]

Novel Membrane Synthesis

Membranes are another promising class of materials that exhibit selective chemical transport, and may be organic, inorganic, or hybrid in nature. Membranes are of great interest to replace energy-intensive distillation processes used in the petrochemical industry, such as in the separation of olefin / paraffin mixtures, and may offer a more energetically favorable means of carrying out certain gas separations. However, wide-spread implementation of membranes is currently limited by factors such as poor processability, selectivity, and permeability. The CGS is seeking to capitalize on the selectivity for various gases exhibited by MOFs and the transport properties of polymer membranes to produce composite, or mixed matrix, membranes with exceptional separation performance. Researchers in the CGS have demonstrated that polymer membranes incorporating the well-known M2(dobdc) exhibit enhanced selectivity for ethylene over ethane and improved resistance to plasticization compared to the pure polymers (Figure 2).[7] Progress is also being made in the development of pure MOF membranes through templated growth mechanisms.[8]


To understand the separation performance of new materials, it is essential to develop experimental techniques that can provide insight into their relevant molecular properties and how these influence gas adsorption behavior. The CGS is currently pioneering new methods for characterizing gas adsorption in situ, including gas cells for single-crystal X-ray diffraction (Figure 3) and X-ray absorption spectroscopy,[9] which can give valuable information regarding material structure and electronic state upon gas binding, respectively. Solid state Nuclear Magnetic Resonance spectroscopy is also a valuable tool for studying adsorbate behavior, and research within the Center has given elucidated unique phase dynamics within MOFs wherein the critical point of a liquid can be decreased simply by changing framework structure.[10]


Computational guidance is an invaluable asset given the overwhelming number of possible materials that may be synthesized and evaluated for gas separations. In addition to serving as a valuable tool to corroborate experimental results, computational efforts within the Center are geared toward developing a detailed microscopic understanding of the structure, electronic, and magnetic properties of MOFs, and in particular how these properties give rise to gaseous adsorption. Center researchers use novel density functional theory (DFT), quantum mechanical, and statistical mechanical methods in order to predict the performance of materials in various separation and capture processes[11, 12] and to carry out large-scale screening calculations, for instance to determine the best materials to separate xenon from krypton gas.[13] For example, a new DFT-based approach has been used to compute binding energies for several small molecules within the M2(dobdc) family. The gases investigated include some of the major and minor components of power plant exhaust streams (flue gas), and the results corroborated experimental results while also identifying new framework/gas pairings for advantageous separations.[14]

[1] (view) Rosi, N. L.; Kim, J.; Eddaoudi, M.; Chen, B.; O’Keeffe, M.; Yaghi, O. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 1504.

[2] (view) Dietzel, P. D. C.; Blom, R.; Fjellvåg, H. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2008, 3624.

[3] (view) McDonald, T. M.; Lee, W. R.; Mason, J. A.; Wiers, B. M.; Hong, C. S.; Long, J. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 7056.

[4] (view) Lee, J. S.; Vlaisavljevich, B.; Britt, D. K.; Brown, C. M.; Haranczyk, M.; Neaton, J. B.; Smit, B.; Long, J. R.; Queen, W. L. Adv. Mater. 2015, 27, 5785.

[5] (view) Maserati, L.; Meckler, S. M.; Li, C.; Helms, B. A. Chem. Mater. 2016, 28, 1581.

[6] (view) McDonald, T. M. et al. Nature 2015, 519, 303.

[7] (view) Bachman, J. E.; Smith, Z. P.; Li, T.; Xu, T.; Long, J. R. Nature Mater. 2016, 15, 845.

[8] (view) Meckler, S. M.; Li, C.; Queen, W. L.; Williams, T. E.; Long, J. R.; Buonsanti, R.; Milliron, D. J.; Helms, B. A. Chem. Mater. 2015, 27, 7673.

[9] (view) Drisdell, W. S.; Poloni, R.; McDonald, T. M.; Long, J. R.; Smit, B.; Neaton, J. B.; Prendergast, D.; Kortright, J. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 18183.

[10] (view) Braun, E.; Chen, J. J.; Schnell, S. K.; Lin, L.-C.; Reimer, J. A.; Smit, B. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 14349.

[11](view) Lin, L.-C.; Berger, A. H.; Martin, R. L.; Kim, J.; Swisher, J. A.; Jariwala, K.; Rycroft, C. H.; Bhown, A. S.; Deem, M. W.; Haranczyk, M.; Smit, B. Nature Mater. 2012, 11, 633.

[12](view) Xiang, Z.; Mercado, R.; Huck, J. M.; Wang, H.; Guo, Z.; Wang, W.; Cao, D.; Haranczyk, M.; Smit, B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 13301.

[13] (view) Simon, C. M.; Mercado, R.; Schnell, S. K.; Smit, B.; Haranczyk, M. Chem. Mater. 2015, 27, 4459.

[14] (view) Lee, K.; Howe, J. D.; Lin, L.-C.; Smit, B.; Neaton, J. B. Chem. Mater. 2015, 27, 668.